DISCUSSION 4B:  HIROSHIMA, THE ENOLA GAY AND HISTORICAL MEMORY


INTRODUCTION

Controversy involving the "Enola Gay" did not end with the cancelled 1995 exhibit.  In 2003, the Smithsonian announced plans for the display of the fully-reconstructed plane at a large new facility just outside Washington.  The center's curator, retired General Jack Dailey, declared that the machine would be shown "in all its glory as a magnificent technological achievement."

The day the exhibit opened, American antinuclear activists and Japanese hibakusha staged a silent protest at the site.  One unaffiliated demonstrator threw red paint on the "Enola Gay."  Some museum visitors responded to the vigil by chanting "Remember Pearl Harbor" and "Go Home."


READING ASSIGNMENT

Carefully browse through several of the following web-sites:

THE ENOLA GAY SINCE 1995:


THE 60 YEAR ANNIVERSARY:


ESSAYS AND REFLECTIONS:


OTHER SOURCE MATERIAL:


DISCUSSION FORUM

The discussion forum for this week is divided into two related but nonetheless distinct sections.

PART I

To what extent did last week's role-playing exercise help to illustrate the contrasting perspectives of the various stakeholders in the 1995 Smithsonian "Enola Gay" controversy?  How would you assess the successes and failures of that assignment?  Who owns the past?  Who has the authority to speak to its power and meaning?  Can the Smithsonian debate be used to illustrate broader themes here?

PART II

What do you think is most interesting about the post-1995 history of the "Enola Gay?"  How would you begin to analyze the August 6, 2005 sixty-year anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima?

 

This software is licensed
under the BC Commons License Opens in new window.