DISCUSSION 6B:  THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION


INTRODUCTION

In 1994, South Africa held its first democratic elections.  Nelson Mandela, the African National Congress leader recently-released after three decades of imprisonment on Robben Island, became President.  The citizens of a multiracial society then confronted the issue of how best to come to terms with a conflict-ridden, white supremacist past.

Rather than concentrate upon bringing perpetrators to account, the new government instead decided to focus on healing.  A commission was established that would investigate political crimes committed by the apartheid regime and its opponents between 1960 and 1994.  Chaired by Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the mandate of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was to bear witness to "the nature, causes and extent of gross violations of human rights" in the previous years.  Anyone who believed they had been a victim could offer testimony to the TRC.  Perpetrators also were encouraged to come forward with the possibility that they might be granted amnesty.  As the name of the investigative body suggested, the emphasis in the process was placed not on justice but on truth.  The revelation of truth, it was thought, would promote reconciliation and the consequent ability to move towards a better future.

By the time the commission released its main report in 1998, it had taken statements from more than 20,000 victims and received some 7,000 petitions for amnesty from perpetrators.  Ultimately, 849 of these latter appeals were approved.  Although the TRC members identified the government and its representatives, including former President P.W. Botha, as the most systematic violators of human rights in the apartheid era, they also described atrocities committed by other high-profile groups and individuals, such as the ANC, Winnie Madikizela-Mandela (former wife of Nelson Mandela) and Inkatha Freedom Party head Mangosuthu Buthelezi.  Some criticized the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for its inability to impose consequences upon perpetrators.  Others welcomed its work as a bold experiment to remove the chains associated with official lies, hidden pains, silences and festering resentments.


READING ASSIGNMENT

1)  Start with the the following:


2)  Browse carefully in several of the following web-sites:

News Articles

Web-Sites

Audio Sources


DISCUSSION FORUM

THE PRIMARY QUESTIONCompare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission model to those focused upon bringing perpetrators to justice (eg. the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia).

ASSOCIATED QUESTIONSWhat is the tension, if any, between justice and reconciliation?  Will the truth "set us free?"  Does confronting the truth about the past promote healing or rather only open up old wounds?  Should those who commit crimes in the name of the state ever receive amnesty?

 

This software is licensed
under the BC Commons License Opens in new window.